Workplace Defamation – A Basic Overview
Since many terminated and current employees ask about it, I thought I might dive into the treacherous waters of defamation in the workplace. Defamatory conduct in the workplace may occur, for example, when a discharged employee is removed from an employer’s premises by security personnel, creating the false impression that the employee had committed a crime. Other times, a terminated employee may find out that a former employer is making, what the employee feels, are false statements about how the employment relationship ended or how the employee performed.
Let’s start with some basics – defamation is the unprivileged publication of a false statement tending to harm the reputation of another person. The elements necessary to prove defamation are:
- First, the content of the communication must be false, must contain an assertion of fact, not an opinion; and must reasonably be understood as negative.
- Second, the communication must be “published” which essentially means that the statement was: (a) written (libel) or spoken (slander), (b) by the employer or its agent(s), (c) to at least one other person (not the plaintiff), and (d) the recipient understood the statement.
Publication occurs when a statement is communicated to any person other than the party defamed. Publication may occur when one supervisor makes a false statement about the employee to another supervisor (e.g., a statement made by an employee’s former supervisor to his current supervisor that plaintiff had “misused company funds” was found to satisfy the publication requirement.)
- Third, the employee must show that the statement or conduct referred to him or herself. There is no requirement that the statement refer to the person by name. A statement “refers” to an employee even if the recipient of the communication mistakenly, but reasonably, understands that the statement was intended to refer to the defamed party.
- Fourth, intent or “malice” may be required to overcome many of the qualified privileges granted to employers.
- Finally, the employee must prove that injury occurred because of the communication. Since defamation involves injury to reputation, the employee must show that actual damage has occurred to the esteem that the employee enjoys in his or her community. The one exception is defamation per se where no special damages need be proved.
Asserting and winning a defamation claim from conduct related to the workplace can be quite difficult given numerous privileges and qualifications.
In the first lawsuit of its kind to make it to trial in California, Grubhub fought allegations of misclassifying its drivers as independent contractors instead of employees. Other worker misclassification lawsuits in…
California courts have been dealing with a growing number of worker misclassification cases that have resulted from the expansion of the gig economy. In one such lawsuit, a federal judge recently approved…
A recent case serves as an important reminder about the protections that California labor laws provide to workers. Employers can be liable if they misclassify their workers and fail to comply with…
Silicon Valley has recently been hit by a series of complaints about inappropriate behavior in the workplace. Not long ago, Uber CEO Travis Kalanick stepped down amid allegations of sexual harassment within…