Workplace Harassment – What Is and Is Not Harassment?

Although the terms “harassment” or “hostile work environment” are often used to describe a difficult work environment, not every malicious or callous act taken by an employer against an employee qualifies as a legal wrong. Rather, the harassing acts must be “because of” the employee’s status in a protected group such as race, color, sex, religion, national origin, ancestry, age, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, veteran status, or medical condition.

Harassment, when based on the criteria noted above, can come in a number of forms including criticism, reprimands, and disparate treatment. If the employer permits an atmosphere within the work place that is hostile to members of the protected classes, the employer is still liable even if the complaining employee is not the direct subject of the harassing acts. Pervasive atmospheres, however, are not created by single, isolated incidents but by repeated regularity so that the harassing atmosphere constitutes a regular part of the working environment.

To qualify as a violation of California law, the harassment must occur within the working environment. Private harassment that takes place away from and is unrelated to the work-place is not prohibited conduct under California law. Further, the discriminatory acts taken against the employee must be attributable to the employer itself; workplace harassment by an employee who is of the same level as the harassed employee by itself does not constitute workplace harassment because the harassing employee’s is not considered to be the “employer.”

However, where one employee harasses another and the employer knows or has reason to know of the harassment and fails to take reasonable and prompt action to quell the conduct, then the employer may be liable for harassment. Additionally, if the harassing acts are committed by an employee with supervisory or managerial duties, then California attributes those harassing acts to the employer and holds the employer directly liable for the harassing conduct. Either way, the harassed employee may sue both the individual harasser and the employer for the harassing acts.

If you feel that a co-worker or supervisors conduct has crossed the line and might be harassment, seek legal counsel as soon as possible to learn more about your rights.

Read more

wrongful termination attorney

Cheesecake Factory sued for firing worker in retaliation for discrimination complaint

A former Cheesecake Factory employee filed a wrongful termination and retaliation lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court against the popular restaurant chain. She was allegedly fired in retaliation for complaining about a…

READ ARTICLE
disability discrimination lawyer

LAPD officer wins $1 million in disability discrimination lawsuit

Just because an employee has a disability does not mean they must stop working. Under the law, employees with disabilities have a right to keep their jobs and seek damages against employers…

READ ARTICLE
wage violation lawyer

Sushi restaurant ordered to pay almost $30,000 in back wages to cooks

Employers looking to cut corners may sometimes think they can get away with not paying employees all the wages they have earned. Not only does such behavior result in employees missing out…

READ ARTICLE
wage theft lawyer

Senior care facility fined for wage theft after state investigation

Employees in certain industries are required to work overtime or be on call. Under California law, they must be paid for all time spent working beyond their regular hours. Employers are also…

READ ARTICLE
SEEN ON
bloomberg
sfgate
kpix
cnnmoney
marin-ij
dailypost
news10