NO FEE UNLESS YOU WIN

Workplace Harassment – What Is and Is Not Harassment?

Although the terms “harassment” or “hostile work environment” are often used to describe a difficult work environment, not every malicious or callous act taken by an employer against an employee qualifies as a legal wrong. Rather, the harassing acts must be “because of” the employee’s status in a protected group such as race, color, sex, religion, national origin, ancestry, age, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, veteran status, or medical condition.

Harassment, when based on the criteria noted above, can come in a number of forms including criticism, reprimands, and disparate treatment. If the employer permits an atmosphere within the work place that is hostile to members of the protected classes, the employer is still liable even if the complaining employee is not the direct subject of the harassing acts. Pervasive atmospheres, however, are not created by single, isolated incidents but by repeated regularity so that the harassing atmosphere constitutes a regular part of the working environment.

To qualify as a violation of California law, the harassment must occur within the working environment. Private harassment that takes place away from and is unrelated to the work-place is not prohibited conduct under California law. Further, the discriminatory acts taken against the employee must be attributable to the employer itself; workplace harassment by an employee who is of the same level as the harassed employee by itself does not constitute workplace harassment because the harassing employee’s is not considered to be the “employer.”

However, where one employee harasses another and the employer knows or has reason to know of the harassment and fails to take reasonable and prompt action to quell the conduct, then the employer may be liable for harassment. Additionally, if the harassing acts are committed by an employee with supervisory or managerial duties, then California attributes those harassing acts to the employer and holds the employer directly liable for the harassing conduct. Either way, the harassed employee may sue both the individual harasser and the employer for the harassing acts.

If you feel that a co-worker or supervisors conduct has crossed the line and might be harassment, seek legal counsel as soon as possible to learn more about your rights.

Read more

San Francisco unpaid wage lawyer

Starbucks must pay workers for off-the-clock tasks, says Supreme Court

A landmark court ruling in a wage theft case against Starbucks could signal changes for employers throughout California. Starbucks can no longer avoid paying employees for time spent on performing tasks outside...

READ ARTICLE
San Francisco unpaid wage attorney

Cheesecake Factory owes janitors $4.6 million in wage theft case

Large companies that use contracting and subcontracting sometimes do so in an attempt to avoid responsibility for ensuring their workers are paid proper wages. According to California Labor Commissioner Julie A. Su,...

READ ARTICLE
san francisco unpaid wage lawyer

La Taqueria fined $600,000 for wage violations as workers win key workplace changes

San Francisco eatery La Taqueria has enjoyed immense popularity, even appearing on The San Francisco Chronicle’s annual Top 100 restaurants list. However, the 45-year-old restaurant has received negative publicity lately due to...

READ ARTICLE
sexual harassment lawyer

State audit criticizes University of California’s handling of sexual misconduct claims

The University of California (UC) needs to improve its handling of sexual harassment complaints, according to a recent state audit. The report revealed persistent issues such as delayed investigations and inconsistencies in...

READ ARTICLE
SEEN ON
bloomberg
sfgate
kpix
cnnmoney
marin-ij
dailypost
news10