Wrongful Termination – When does a Termination Qualify as Wrongful?

One of the most frustrating and perhaps bewildering moments in any employee’s career is finding out that your employer is ending the employment relationship. After the initial shock, questioning, bargaining, accusations, and maybe a moment of self-criticism, employees often seek out a lawyer for information. Inevitably, the most common question to the lawyer is a variation of “my boss fired me for no real reason, does this qualify as a wrongful termination?”

Despite the loaded word “wrongful” in “wrongful termination,” many if not most terminations do not violate the law. The vast majority of employment relationships are “at-will,” meaning that either the employer or the employee may terminate the employment relationship at any time for any reason or no reason. Employers may even give the dismissed employee a reason which is false, evasive, vague, or even an outright lie. But just because your employer lies about the reasons for the termination does not make it a “wrongful termination.”

However, the right to terminate an employee for any or no reason is not absolute. One important limitation is based on the premise that employers should not be permitted to frustrate vital public policies. These public policies must be well established and fundamental meaning that the employer knew or should have known that terminating the employee would violate a public policy. The difficulty lies in determining when a public policy qualifies as well established and fundamental.

In California, wrongful termination in violation of public policy may be based on a statute, common law, or the California Constitution. A termination may violate public policy where an employee is discharged for refusing to perform an illegal act; for performing a statutory duty, such as serving on a jury; for invoking statutory rights, such as filing worker’s compensation claim; or for complaining about discrimination. California also extends public policy protection to some whistleblower acts in which the employee reports unlawful conduct by the employer.

California, like most other states, considers terminations in violation of public policy to be a tort, which is a civil wrong. Accordingly, traditional tort remedies generally apply which include lost wages, damages for pain and suffering and, if the employer’s conduct was malicious or willful, punitive damages.

A word of caution, terminations come in all forms and for all kinds of reasons, some legitimate, some not so legitimate. But after some hard analysis, if your company fired you and the reasons just don’t seem to add up, seek professional advice.

Read more

wrongful termination attorney

Cheesecake Factory sued for firing worker in retaliation for discrimination complaint

A former Cheesecake Factory employee filed a wrongful termination and retaliation lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court against the popular restaurant chain. She was allegedly fired in retaliation for complaining about a…

READ ARTICLE
disability discrimination lawyer

LAPD officer wins $1 million in disability discrimination lawsuit

Just because an employee has a disability does not mean they must stop working. Under the law, employees with disabilities have a right to keep their jobs and seek damages against employers…

READ ARTICLE
wage violation lawyer

Sushi restaurant ordered to pay almost $30,000 in back wages to cooks

Employers looking to cut corners may sometimes think they can get away with not paying employees all the wages they have earned. Not only does such behavior result in employees missing out…

READ ARTICLE
wage theft lawyer

Senior care facility fined for wage theft after state investigation

Employees in certain industries are required to work overtime or be on call. Under California law, they must be paid for all time spent working beyond their regular hours. Employers are also…

READ ARTICLE
SEEN ON
bloomberg
sfgate
kpix
cnnmoney
marin-ij
dailypost
news10