NO FEE UNLESS YOU WIN

What the Grubhub trial could mean for workers in the gig economy

In the first lawsuit of its kind to make it to trial in California, Grubhub fought allegations of misclassifying its drivers as independent contractors instead of employees. Other worker misclassification lawsuits in the past have been resolved via settlements.

The Lawson v. Grubhub case was filed in a San Francisco federal court in December 2015. Plaintiff Raef Lawson formerly worked as a driver for the food delivery startup for five months starting in October 2015. He claimed he was underpaid because he was classified as an independent contractor instead of an employee. Lawson also said Grubhub owed him overtime pay and reimbursements for business expenses.

The Grubhub trial’s outcome could have a big impact on the employment status of workers in the fast-growing gig economy. It could set a precedent for other similar lawsuits. The case has received substantial attention due to its implications for on-demand companies such Uber, Lyft, Postmates and Doordash that rely on independent contractors.

One of the key factors considered in the case was the amount of control Grubhub had over Lawson and other drivers. Lawson’s attorney noted that the company tracked his location, told him to wear a Grubhub hat and shirt, and required him to accept almost all deliveries in under 20 seconds.

However, Grubhub maintained that the company did not have control over Lawson. He was free to set his own hours, wear anything he wanted and take the routes of his choice for deliveries, among other factors.

In addition, Grubhub argued food delivery is not a core part of its business. The company said it simply connects customers with restaurants. This aspect is likely to be significant in determining whether the drivers are considered independent contractors or employees.

Read more

San Francisco unpaid wage lawyer

Starbucks must pay workers for off-the-clock tasks, says Supreme Court

A landmark court ruling in a wage theft case against Starbucks could signal changes for employers throughout California. Starbucks can no longer avoid paying employees for time spent on performing tasks outside...

READ ARTICLE
San Francisco unpaid wage attorney

Cheesecake Factory owes janitors $4.6 million in wage theft case

Large companies that use contracting and subcontracting sometimes do so in an attempt to avoid responsibility for ensuring their workers are paid proper wages. According to California Labor Commissioner Julie A. Su,...

READ ARTICLE
san francisco unpaid wage lawyer

La Taqueria fined $600,000 for wage violations as workers win key workplace changes

San Francisco eatery La Taqueria has enjoyed immense popularity, even appearing on The San Francisco Chronicle’s annual Top 100 restaurants list. However, the 45-year-old restaurant has received negative publicity lately due to...

READ ARTICLE
sexual harassment lawyer

State audit criticizes University of California’s handling of sexual misconduct claims

The University of California (UC) needs to improve its handling of sexual harassment complaints, according to a recent state audit. The report revealed persistent issues such as delayed investigations and inconsistencies in...

READ ARTICLE
SEEN ON
bloomberg
sfgate
kpix
cnnmoney
marin-ij
dailypost
news10