NO FEE UNLESS YOU WIN

Jury rules in favor of Home Depot worker in wrongful termination case

Just because a person is disabled does not mean they must stop working. Under disability law, employers are required to discuss reasonable accommodations with disabled employees. A reasonable accommodation can be any type of assistance that helps the employee continue working, and is not too expensive or disruptive. Some examples are modified work schedules or specialized equipment.

A former Home Depot employee was recently awarded $175,000 after a California state court jury found that the company failed to provide reasonable accommodations for her disability. The woman also alleged she suffered retaliation for reporting improper sales practices in the store.

Patricia Tillotson filed a lawsuit against Home Depot in 2015. She claimed she was fired because of her age, disability and whistleblower activities. At 58 years of age, Tillotson was her department’s oldest worker when her employment was terminated.

Her disability was the result of varicose veins and breast cancer surgery. She had difficulty lifting heavy objects and was unable to stand for long periods of time.

Home Depot claimed Tillotson and the rest of her department were fired because they gave unauthorized markdowns to customers. The retail giant argued that the decision to fire Tillotson was unrelated to her medical conditions and complaints.

Although the jury sided with Tillotson, the amount they decided on was significantly less than the over $3.3 million the lawsuit originally sought. While she was awarded past and future economic damages, there was no compensation for emotional distress.

At the end of the 10-day trial in Los Angeles County Superior Court, the jury determined that Tillotson’s age and disability were not the driving factors behind her termination. However, they found that Home Depot failed to engage in a good faith dialogue to provide reasonable accommodation so that Tillotson could continue working despite her disability.

Read more

San Francisco unpaid wage lawyer

Starbucks must pay workers for off-the-clock tasks, says Supreme Court

A landmark court ruling in a wage theft case against Starbucks could signal changes for employers throughout California. Starbucks can no longer avoid paying employees for time spent on performing tasks outside...

READ ARTICLE
San Francisco unpaid wage attorney

Cheesecake Factory owes janitors $4.6 million in wage theft case

Large companies that use contracting and subcontracting sometimes do so in an attempt to avoid responsibility for ensuring their workers are paid proper wages. According to California Labor Commissioner Julie A. Su,...

READ ARTICLE
san francisco unpaid wage lawyer

La Taqueria fined $600,000 for wage violations as workers win key workplace changes

San Francisco eatery La Taqueria has enjoyed immense popularity, even appearing on The San Francisco Chronicle’s annual Top 100 restaurants list. However, the 45-year-old restaurant has received negative publicity lately due to...

READ ARTICLE
sexual harassment lawyer

State audit criticizes University of California’s handling of sexual misconduct claims

The University of California (UC) needs to improve its handling of sexual harassment complaints, according to a recent state audit. The report revealed persistent issues such as delayed investigations and inconsistencies in...

READ ARTICLE
SEEN ON
bloomberg
sfgate
kpix
cnnmoney
marin-ij
dailypost
news10